The following is a transcript from the Pro America Report.
Welcome, welcome. Welcome, Ed Martin here on the Pro America Report.
I have to tell you I have a Wonderful treat for you all. In a few moments, you’ll have a two-part interview with Garrett Ziegler, the author of the massive tome called Report on the Biden Laptop. We were we I needed to record that interview with him, and we went long and I just stayed on. It’s it’s exceptional and it’s very interesting. So you’ll enjoy that.
Welcome to the Pro America Report. Ed Martin here with you. Thank you for joining us. And you know I what you need to know today the topic, it doesn’t directly relate to the Hunter Biden laptop in the interview with Garrett Ziegler, except in this way, when you read this massive book, when you look at all the information. You say to yourself, holy cow, there’s something going on that they’re really not being fair about. They’re they’re not actually handling what has gone on. I mean, there’s there, it’s obvious that there is a major, major set of issues that’s not being addressed by anyone in law enforcement. And then you say to yourself, ah. The problem and The reality say that way. The reality of lawfare. Which is a problem for you and me. Is that lawfare Is a kind of warfare and it’s waged by people against other people. It’s not equal, it’s not systematic. It’s targeted. Lawfare is targeted. So you say, well, isn’t justice in America. And the rule of law and the sort of crown jewel of American life is the Constitution and the rule of law and our founding values. Yeah, but once you’re. Into lawfare and it’s anything goes and you can indict people for this or that and you can arrest pro-lifers on a on a law that’s designed to sort of catch them. It’s basically a a catching a catch pro-lifers for protesting law. And put him in jail once you start targeting people. And once it became clearer and clearer that it was not happening based on justice and and a system it’s based on targeting, that’s lawfare. That’s lawfare and Americans are seeing it now all the Time and they’re getting more and more disgusted, I hope getting more and more disgusted in such a way that it will make a difference and we can stop it. But. It’s a problem. It’s a problem which brings me to. Not the reality of ignoring Garrett Ziegler and his research, not the reality of of ignoring the lies and distortions of the Select Committee. On January 6th, the the Pelosi picked Select Committee that was so clearly targeting and just making you know it was untrue. None of that. That’s all the use of government. It’s big government, big government, big tech and big media working together. The narrative machine, as I’ve told you, no,
let’s slide over to the actual center. The man at the center. Of this period of time, in terms of federal law, Attorney General Merrick Garland, who was up on Capitol Hill, he was up on Capitol Hill and he had to testify, and before the House. And two different congressmen, one who I know very well, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, one who I’ve never met him. Maybe if I did, it’s only once a guy named Thomas McClintock of California been around a while. He was once the state senator representing my in laws. My mother and father-in-law who live down near Thousand Oaks. He’s now a congressman. His district is further north in in California. Well regarded guy. And so each of them was questioning Merrick Garland and Tom Massie, who has a history on this topic, said, hey, what about this Ray Epps thing? You finally indicted Ray Epps for one misdemeanor count. When everybody else that got anywhere near the capitol has gotten misdemeanors, misdemeanors, and felonies and everything else, it sure looks like you went light on him. And here’s where it gets just pathetic, in my estimation. Merrick Garland was asked. Directly by Thomas Massie. Hey, can you confirm? How many or if any? Federal agents and and and undercover were at the Capitol, and then Merrick Garland said. I have no knowledge. I can’t answer that I have No knowledge. And and Thomas Massie was like what? And it, Merrick Garland sort of danced back and said I have no personal knowledge of that. And Thomas Massie started to say. And he sort of got cut off by his loss of time. You had two years. Since I last asked You this you don’t have any idea how clueless are you?
And my comeback would be pretty clueless, pretty clueless. And it’s by design. There’s a point in this where it’s by design to have certain Members of this administration stay removed So they can deny it while the underlings and the others are going running rampant. Ray Epps, charged with one misdemeanor, is and compared to what they’re doing to everybody else is the indication that Ray Epps was working with that he’s, look, he’s either an agent, you know, and I don’t mean capital A agent, some kind of paid agent, some kind of paid informant, some kind of paid expert. Or or he’s useful to them. He’s got something else. He might just be, you know, in on the in on the thing he might not be paid, but there’s something we’re not seeing as proven by the charges against him. And Merrick, Garland was pathetic.
Well, now over to Thomas McClintock, the congressman from California. Congressman McClintock says. You know Jack Smith. Was reprimanded by the Supreme Court for being using the law to politically attack the governor. The sitting Republican governor of Virginia and damage him. He was rebuked the, all nine justices threw the case out. He was rebuked. He was at the middle of the IRS scandal back in the Obama era and and, McClintock says. And you guys picked this guy to prosecute the president’s chief rival. Was there no one else that would have had A and and and and Garland Merrick Garland with a straight face said, Ohh man. Just look at look at his. Look at what he filed, meaning not his record, not what he’s done. Not these obvious political games that he’s played in the past, but look at what he filed as if just the filings. That this Jack Smith have done is what’s supposed to justify his pick. In other words, he didn’t answer the question. He didn’t even get close to answering the question.
These people are so past Trying to even fake it. They’re just ignoring we the people and telling us that they don’t care. That they don’t care. Yesterday there was two days ago whenever it was in the last few days, there was a. Different hearing of The the House Administration Subcommittee on January 6th, and that was convened by the chairman, Barry Loudermilk, Congressman from Georgia, and on the other side of the ranking minority member is a Representative Torres. I think from California. And she, in her statement, said it’s the worst thing ever. Insurrection, insurrection. And let me show you a picture of the gallows. The noose isn’t this terrible. The gallows and the noose were performance art or or a setup. And here’s the trick. When Bubba Wallace, the NASCAR African American NASCAR racer, went into his garage at a NASCAR race and saw The rope hanging. From the garage door was formed in a noose. He thought it was a hate crime and called the FBI. The FBI came within an hour or two and within 24. Excuse me. 48 hours. They had a report and they said no, no, no. Somebody just was messing with the knot. It wasn’t. Even a noose. In the case of the gallows, which were not big enough to be real gallows, they weren’t a real thing, but they were a big stage prop. We have nothing. The FBI hasn’t been able to find out who it was.
I mean, there’s at least three different ways you could look at it. One, if you thought it was a real gallows and people were gonna be hung, wouldn’t you want to know who was planning that? That would sound like attempted murder. It would sound like some kind of, and that’s 1. 2. It’s performance art, and it’s meant to terrorize people and we Ought to know who Did that. If it was a, you know, Donald Trump’s political committee or the Democrat Party. Let’s find out. Still a scandal for the country still makes us look bad. Or three number 3, something else. Something else. And the something else could be it was done by somebody. It was a setup. It was a Political operation. It was a a law enforcement operation. It was something. And when you say that our law enforcement Has found nothing. It’s like the pipe bomber. It it it it it it? It does not fit into any reasonable calculation that there is not more information publicly known about these major events
and the fact that it’s not publicly known means the government knows and isn’t telling us.
That that has to be your assumption. I’m not saying I know it’s true. I’m just saying that has to be your assumption. There’s nothing else that makes sense. There’s nothing else that fits the facts. That fits the facts. In this situation. There’s nothing else that makes sense in the situation that that you could rely on that you could think reasonably about. It’s amazing to me. It’s amazing to me that we’re we’re seeing this go on.
And so Merrick Garland again, it’s a disgrace, it’s a disgrace. But when it’s lawfare, when it’s lawfare, it’s OK for the people in power to lie to to, you know, to to dissemble as they say, to hide things, to confuse people and to just ignore us. And that’s what they’re doing all the time now. That’s what they’re doing all the time. It’s amazing. It’s amazing to watch. It should be a Bigger scandal. It Won’t be, but there you. Have it. Alright, that’s what you need to. Know today and. I’ll have more on this gallows, this gallows and noose a lot more. I can’t tell you yet, but I’ll tell you soon.
We will take a break and we’ll come back. It’s Ed Martin here on the Pro America Report. Don’t forget, visit promericareport.com proamericareport.com sign up for the daily e-mail there and at Phyllisschlafly.com more of information about our work. We’ll be right back. Ed Martin On the Pro America Report.